Historical Best Day of Month to Dollar Cost Average or Invest: Updated: 1950 to 2014
This article updates the previous "Best Day of Month to Dollar Cost Average".
1. This article now covers February 14, 1950 up to July 8, 2014.
2. The previous article used the Average S&P 500 methodology, which over weighed the S&P 500 when it is large (over 1500), and under weighed the S&P 500 when it was small (around 20 on the S&P 500 in 1950).
3. This article uses the "Percent Above 30 Trading Day Moving Average" methodology. This way, whether the S&P 500 had a low value or high value, the results have equal weight.
4. To determine the best day of month to dollar cost average, choose the lowest "percent above 30 trading day moving average" value.
Chart:
The Results:
The best two days of the month to dollar cost average are on the 26th (#1) and 25th (#2) with the lowest value of percent above 30 trading day moving average.
#3a: 19th (0.20%)
#3b: 27th (0.20%)
#4a: 10th (0.22%)
#4b: 24th (0.22%)
The rest of the values can be seen in the chart above.
Beginning of the Month Boost:
At the beginning of the month, the percent above 30 trading day moving average seems to be at its highest values.
One possible reason why is because of investment in 401k and retirement funds close to the beginning of the month, which pushes the S&P 500 up during this time.
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
Historical Best Day of Month to Dollar Cost Average or Invest: UPDATED: 1950 to 2014
Wednesday, July 2, 2014
"Don't Fight the Fed" is Wrong? What Is One Year Return After Rate Hikes or Rate Cuts?
A. There is a common Wall Street mantra: "Don't Fight The Fed".
When the Fed is pumping liquidity (reducing Fed Funds Rate, instituting Quantitative Easing (QE)), you should follow the market upwards. If the Fed is taking away liquidity (raising Fed Funds Rate, and taking away Quantitative Easing), then be careful in the stock market.
This "Don't Fight the Fed" mantra seems to have worked very well since 2009, as the Fed cuts rates and institutes many Quantitative Easing programs, resulting in the stock market having a very good rally.
If the Fed starts to cut back on Quantitative Easing and raises rates, it is best to be careful in the market.
B. Is "Don't Fight the Fed" still Valid?
Since July 2000 (till July 2014), what is the one year future return of the S&P 500 every time the Fed has raised or cut the Fed Funds rate? Does this validate "Don't Fight the Fed?"
The results are as follows:
1. The S&P 500 return one year after the Fed cuts rates (since July 2000) averages: -14.2%
2. The S&P 500 return one year after the Fed raises rates (since July 2000) averages: 10.1%
Based on the one year forward return after the Federal Reserve cuts or raises rates, the S&P 500 is up when the Fed raises rates, and the S&P 500 is down when the Fed cuts rates.
This is opposite of the mantra: "Don't Fight the Fed!"
C. There is a better correlation using another metric: The actual Fed Funds Rate
Since the "Don't Fight the Fed" doesn't seem to work, is there a better metric to determine whether the one year S&P 500 forward return would be positive or negative?
After researching the data, it isn't whether the Fed is cutting rates or raising rates, but the actual Fed Funds rate plays a big role in the S&P 500 forward return:
The results are as follows:
Since July 2000, the S&P 500 return one year after the Fed changes rates (up or down) or announces a QE program when:
1. Fed Funds Rate is less than or equal to 1%: 13.1%
2. Fed Funds Rate is between 1% and 2% (not including 1%): -1.9%
3. Fed Funds Rate is between 2% and 3% (not including 2%): -8.9%
4. Fed Funds Rate is between 3% and 4% (not including 3%): -7.1%
5. Fed Funds Rate is between 4% and 5% (not including 4%): -6.3%
6. Fed Funds Rate is between 5% and 6% (not including 5%): -2.1%
Based on this, the actual Fed Funds rate seems to have a better correlation with the S&P 500 one year forward return. The best one year S&P 500 forward return is when the Fed Funds Rate is less than 2%. Fed funds rate greater than 2% has a more negative one year forward S&P 500 return.
D. Data Points:
When the Fed is pumping liquidity (reducing Fed Funds Rate, instituting Quantitative Easing (QE)), you should follow the market upwards. If the Fed is taking away liquidity (raising Fed Funds Rate, and taking away Quantitative Easing), then be careful in the stock market.
This "Don't Fight the Fed" mantra seems to have worked very well since 2009, as the Fed cuts rates and institutes many Quantitative Easing programs, resulting in the stock market having a very good rally.
If the Fed starts to cut back on Quantitative Easing and raises rates, it is best to be careful in the market.
B. Is "Don't Fight the Fed" still Valid?
Since July 2000 (till July 2014), what is the one year future return of the S&P 500 every time the Fed has raised or cut the Fed Funds rate? Does this validate "Don't Fight the Fed?"
The results are as follows:
1. The S&P 500 return one year after the Fed cuts rates (since July 2000) averages: -14.2%
2. The S&P 500 return one year after the Fed raises rates (since July 2000) averages: 10.1%
Based on the one year forward return after the Federal Reserve cuts or raises rates, the S&P 500 is up when the Fed raises rates, and the S&P 500 is down when the Fed cuts rates.
This is opposite of the mantra: "Don't Fight the Fed!"
C. There is a better correlation using another metric: The actual Fed Funds Rate
Since the "Don't Fight the Fed" doesn't seem to work, is there a better metric to determine whether the one year S&P 500 forward return would be positive or negative?
After researching the data, it isn't whether the Fed is cutting rates or raising rates, but the actual Fed Funds rate plays a big role in the S&P 500 forward return:
The results are as follows:
Since July 2000, the S&P 500 return one year after the Fed changes rates (up or down) or announces a QE program when:
1. Fed Funds Rate is less than or equal to 1%: 13.1%
2. Fed Funds Rate is between 1% and 2% (not including 1%): -1.9%
3. Fed Funds Rate is between 2% and 3% (not including 2%): -8.9%
4. Fed Funds Rate is between 3% and 4% (not including 3%): -7.1%
5. Fed Funds Rate is between 4% and 5% (not including 4%): -6.3%
6. Fed Funds Rate is between 5% and 6% (not including 5%): -2.1%
Based on this, the actual Fed Funds rate seems to have a better correlation with the S&P 500 one year forward return. The best one year S&P 500 forward return is when the Fed Funds Rate is less than 2%. Fed funds rate greater than 2% has a more negative one year forward S&P 500 return.
D. Data Points:
Date | Fed Funds Start | Fed Funds End | Fed Funds Diff | S&P | S&P Date + 1 year | S&P + 1 year | Return |
7/3/2000 | 6.5 | 1469.54 | 7/3/2001 | 1234.45 | -16.0% | ||
1/2/2001 | 6.5 | 6 | -0.5 | 1283.27 | 1/2/2002 | 1154.67 | -10.0% |
1/31/2001 | 6 | 5.5 | -0.5 | 1373.73 | 1/31/2002 | 1130.2 | -17.7% |
3/19/2001 | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 | 1170.81 | 3/19/2002 | 1170.29 | 0.0% |
4/17/2001 | 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 | 1191.81 | 4/17/2002 | 1126.07 | -5.5% |
5/14/2001 | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 | 1248.92 | 5/14/2002 | 1097.28 | -12.1% |
6/26/2001 | 4 | 3.75 | -0.25 | 1216.76 | 6/26/2002 | 973.53 | -20.0% |
8/20/2001 | 3.75 | 3.5 | -0.25 | 1171.41 | 8/20/2002 | 937.43 | -20.0% |
9/14/2001 | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 | 1037.77 | 9/14/2002 | 889.81 | -14.3% |
10/1/2001 | 3 | 2.5 | -0.5 | 1038.55 | 10/1/2002 | 847.91 | -18.4% |
11/5/2001 | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | 1102.84 | 11/5/2002 | 915.39 | -17.0% |
12/10/2001 | 2 | 1.75 | -0.25 | 1139.93 | 12/10/2002 | 904.45 | -20.7% |
11/5/2002 | 1.75 | 1.25 | -0.5 | 915.39 | 11/5/2003 | 1051.81 | 14.9% |
6/24/2003 | 1.25 | 1 | -0.25 | 983.45 | 6/23/2004 | 1144.06 | 16.3% |
6/29/2004 | 1 | 1.25 | 0.25 | 1136.2 | 6/29/2005 | 1199.85 | 5.6% |
8/9/2004 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 0.25 | 1065.2 | 8/9/2005 | 1231.38 | 15.6% |
9/17/2004 | 1.5 | 1.75 | 0.25 | 1122.2 | 9/17/2005 | 1237.91 | 10.3% |
11/9/2004 | 1.75 | 2 | 0.25 | 1164.08 | 11/9/2005 | 1220.65 | 4.9% |
12/13/2004 | 2 | 2.25 | 0.25 | 1198.68 | 12/13/2005 | 1267.43 | 5.7% |
2/1/2005 | 2.25 | 2.5 | 0.25 | 1189.41 | 2/1/2006 | 1282.46 | 7.8% |
3/21/2005 | 2.5 | 2.75 | 0.25 | 1183.78 | 3/21/2006 | 1297.48 | 9.6% |
5/2/2005 | 2.75 | 3 | 0.25 | 1161.17 | 5/2/2006 | 1313.21 | 13.1% |
6/29/2005 | 3 | 3.25 | 0.25 | 1199.85 | 6/29/2006 | 1272.87 | 6.1% |
8/8/2005 | 3.25 | 3.5 | 0.25 | 1223.13 | 8/8/2006 | 1271.48 | 4.0% |
9/19/2005 | 3.5 | 3.75 | 0.25 | 1231.02 | 9/19/2006 | 1317.64 | 7.0% |
10/31/2005 | 3.75 | 4 | 0.25 | 1207.01 | 10/31/2006 | 1377.94 | 14.2% |
12/12/2005 | 4 | 4.25 | 0.25 | 1260.43 | 12/12/2006 | 1411.56 | 12.0% |
1/30/2006 | 4.25 | 4.5 | 0.25 | 1285.19 | 1/30/2007 | 1428.82 | 11.2% |
3/27/2006 | 4.5 | 4.75 | 0.25 | 1301.61 | 3/27/2007 | 1428.61 | 9.8% |
5/9/2006 | 4.75 | 5 | 0.25 | 1325.14 | 5/9/2007 | 1512.58 | 14.1% |
6/28/2006 | 5 | 5.25 | 0.25 | 1240.12 | 6/28/2007 | 1505.71 | 21.4% |
9/17/2007 | 5.25 | 4.75 | -0.5 | 1476.65 | 9/16/2008 | 1213.6 | -17.8% |
10/30/2007 | 4.75 | 4.5 | -0.25 | 1531.02 | 10/29/2008 | 930.09 | -39.3% |
12/10/2007 | 4.5 | 4.25 | -0.25 | 1515.96 | 12/9/2008 | 888.67 | -41.4% |
1/18/2008 | 4.25 | 3.5 | -0.75 | 1325.19 | 1/17/2009 | 850.12 | -35.8% |
1/29/2008 | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 | 1362.3 | 1/28/2009 | 874.09 | -35.8% |
3/17/2008 | 3 | 2.25 | -0.75 | 1276.6 | 3/17/2009 | 778.12 | -39.0% |
4/29/2008 | 2.25 | 2 | -0.25 | 1390.94 | 4/29/2009 | 873.64 | -37.2% |
10/7/2008 | 2 | 1.5 | -0.5 | 996.23 | 10/7/2009 | 1057.58 | 6.2% |
10/28/2008 | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | 940.58 | 10/28/2009 | 1036.19 | 10.2% |
11/25/2008 | Start QE1 | Start QE1 | 0 | 857.39 | 11/25/2009 | 1110.63 | 29.5% |
12/15/2008 | 1 | 0.25 | -0.75 | 868.57 | 12/15/2009 | 1107.93 | 27.6% |
3/31/2010 | End QE1 | End QE1 | 0 | 1173.27 | 3/31/2011 | 1325.83 | 13.0% |
11/3/2010 | Start QE2 | Start QE2 | 0 | 1197.96 | 11/3/2011 | 1261.15 | 5.3% |
6/30/2011 | End QE2 | End QE2 | 0 | 1320.64 | 6/29/2012 | 1362.16 | 3.1% |
9/13/2012 | Start QE3 | Start QE3 | 0 | 1687.99 | 9/13/2013 | 1687.99 | 0.0% |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)